nLab affine line

Redirected from "global equivariant spectra".
Contents

Contents

Idea

For every Lawvere theory TT containing the theory of abelian groups Isbell dual sheaf topos over formal duals of TT-algebras contains a canonical line object 𝔸 1\mathbb{A}^1.

For TT the theory of commutative rings this is called the affine line .

Definition

Affine line

Let kk be a ring, and TT the Lawvere theory of associative algebras over kk, such that the category of algebras over a Lawvere theory TAlg=Alg kT Alg = Alg_k is the category of kk-algebras.

Definition

The canonical TT-line object is the affine line

𝔸 k:=Spec(F T(*))=Spec(k[t]). \mathbb{A}_k := Spec(F_T(*)) = Spec (k[t]) \,.

Here the free TT-algebra on a single generator F T(*)F_T(*) is the polynomial algebra k[t]Alg kk[t] \in Alg_k on a single generator *=t* = t and Speck[t]Spec k[t] may be regarded as the corresponding object in the opposite category Aff k:=Alg k opAff_k := Alg_k^{op} of affine schemes over SpeckSpec k.

Multiplicative group

The multiplicative group object in Ring opRing^{op} corresponding to the affine line – usually just called the multiplicative group – is the group scheme denoted 𝔾 m\mathbb{G}_m

  • whose underlying affine scheme is

    (𝔸 1{0}):=Spec(k[t,t 1]), (\mathbb{A}^1 - \{0\}) := Spec \left(k[t,t^{-1}]\right) \,,

    where k[t,t 1]k[t,t^{-1}] is the localization of the ring k[t]k[t] at the element t=(t0)t = (t-0).

  • whose multiplication operation

    𝔾 m×𝔾 m𝔾 m \cdot \mathbb{G}_m \times \mathbb{G}_m \to \mathbb{G}_m

    is the morphism in Ring opRing^{op} corresponding to the morphism in Ring

    k[t 1,t 1 1] kk[t 2,t 2 1]k[t,t 1] k[t_1,t_1^{-1}] \otimes_k k[t_2, t_2^{-1}] \leftarrow k[t,t^{-1}]

    given by tt 1t 2t \mapsto t_1 \cdot t_2;

  • whose unit map SpeckSpeck[t,t 1]Spec k \to Spec k[t,t^{-1}] is given by

    t1 t \mapsto 1
  • and whose inversion map Speck[t,t 1]Spec[t,t 1]Spec k[t,t^{-1}] \to Spec[t,t^{-1}] is given by

    tt 1. t \mapsto t^{-1} \,.

Therefore for RR any ring a morphism

SpecR𝔾 m Spec R \longrightarrow \mathbb{G}_m

is equivalently a ring homomorphism

Rk[t,t 1] R \leftarrow k[t,t^{-1}]

which is equivalently a choice of multiplicatively invertible element in RR. Therefore

Hom(SpecR,𝔾 m)R ×=GL 1(R) Hom(Spec R , \mathbb{G}_m) \simeq R^\times = GL_1(R)

is the group of units of RR.

Additive group

The additive group in Ring opRing^{op} corresponding to the affine line – usually just called the additive group – is the group scheme denoted 𝔾 a\mathbb{G}_a

  • whose underlying object is 𝔸 1\mathbb{A}^1 itself;

  • whose addition operation 𝔾 a×𝔾 a𝔾 a\mathbb{G}_a \times \mathbb{G}_a \to \mathbb{G}_a is dually the ring homomorphism

    k[t 1] kk[t 2]k[t] k[t_1] \otimes_k k[t_2] \leftarrow k[t]

    given by

    tt 1+t 2; t \mapsto t_1 + t_2 \,;
  • whose unit map is given by

    t0; t \mapsto 0 \,;
  • whose inversion map is given by

    tt. t \mapsto -t \,.

Group of roots of unity

The group of nnth roots of unity is

μ n=Spec(k[t](t n1)). \mu_n = Spec(k[t](t^n -1)) \,.

This sits inside the multiplicative group via the Kummer sequence

μ n𝔾 m() n𝔾 m. \mu_n \longrightarrow \mathbb{G}_m \stackrel{(-)^n}{\longrightarrow}\mathbb{G}_m \,.

Properties

Grading

Proposition

Let RR be a commutative kk-algebra. There is a natural isomorphism between

  • \mathbb{Z}-gradings on RR;

  • 𝔾 m\mathbb{G}_m-actions on SpecRSpec R.

Proof

For the first direction, let RR be a \mathbb{Z}-graded commutative algebra. Then X=SpecRX = Spec R comes with a 𝔾\mathbb{G}-action given as follows: the action morphism

ρ:X×𝔾 mX \rho : X \times \mathbb{G}_m \to X

is dually the ring homomorphism

R k[t,t 1]R R \otimes_k \mathbb{Z}[t,t^{-1}] \leftarrow R

defined on homogeneous elements rr of degree nn by

rrt n. r \mapsto r \cdot t^n \,.

The action property

X×𝔾 m×𝔾 m Id× X×𝔾 ρ×Id ρ X×𝔾 m ρ X \array{ X \times \mathbb{G}_m \times \mathbb{G}_m &\stackrel{Id \times \cdot}{\to}& X \times \mathbb{G} \\ {}^{\mathllap{\rho} \times Id}\downarrow && \downarrow^{\mathrlap{\rho}} \\ X \times \mathbb{G}_m &\stackrel{\rho}{\to}& X }

is equivalently the equation

r(t 1) n(t 2) n=r(t 1t 2) n r (t_1)^n \cdot (t_2)^n = r (t_1 \cdot t_2)^n

for all nn \in \mathbb{Z}. Similarly the unitality of the action is the equation

(1) n=1. (1)^n = 1 \,.

Conversely, given an action of 𝔾 m\mathbb{G}_m on SpecRSpec R we have some morphism

R[t,t 1]R R[t,t^{-1}] \leftarrow R

that sends

r nr nt n. r \mapsto \sum_{n \in \mathbb{Z}} r_n t^n \,.

By the action property we have that

nr n(t 1t 2) n= n,k(r n) kt 1 nt 2 k. \sum_n r_n (t_1 t_2)^n = \sum_{n,k} (r_n)_k t_1^n t_2^k \,.

Hence

(r n) k={r n ifn=k 0 otherwise (r_n)_k = \left\{ \array{ r_n & if \; n = k \\ 0 & otherwise } \right.

and so the morphism gives a decomposition of RR into pieces labeled by \mathbb{Z}.

One sees that these two constructions are inverse to each other.

Étale homotopy type

Example

For kk a field of characteristic 0, then the affine line 𝔸 k 1\mathbb{A}^1_k has a contractible étale homotopy type . This is no longer the case in positive characteristic.

(HSS 13, section 1)

Internal formulation

Proposition

Let XX be a scheme and Sh(Sch/X)Sh(Sch/X) the big Zariski topos associated to XX. Denote by 𝔸 1\mathbb{A}^1 (the affine line) the ring object TΓ(T,𝒪 T)T \mapsto \Gamma(T,\mathcal{O}_T), i.e. the functor represented by the XX-scheme 𝔸 X 1X×Spec([t])\mathbb{A}^1_X \coloneqq X \times Spec(\mathbb{Z}[t]). Then:

  • 𝔸 1\mathbb{A}^1 is internally a local ring.

  • 𝔸 1\mathbb{A}^1 is internally a field in the sense that any nonzero element is invertible.

  • Internally, any function f:𝔸 1𝔸 1f : \mathbb{A}^1 \to \mathbb{A}^1 is a polynomial function, i.e. of the form f(x)= ia ix if(x) = \sum_i a_i x^i for some coefficients a i:𝔸 1a_i : \mathbb{A}^1. More precisely,

    Sh(Sch/X)f:[𝔸 1,𝔸 1]. na 0,,a n:𝔸 1.x:𝔸 1.f(x)= ia ix i. Sh(Sch/X) \models \forall f : [\mathbb{A}^1,\mathbb{A}^1]. \bigvee_{n \in \mathbb{N}} \exists a_0,\ldots,a_n : \mathbb{A}^1. \forall x : \mathbb{A}^1. f(x) = \sum_i a_i x^i.

    Furthermore, these coefficients are uniquely determined.

Proof

Since the internal logic is local, we can assume that X=Spec(R)X = Spec(R) is affine. The interpretations of the asserted statements using the Kripke–Joyal semantics are:

  • Let SS be an RR-algebra and f,gSf, g \in S be elements such that f+g=1f + g = 1. Then there exists a partition 1= is iS1 = \sum_i s_i \in S such that in the localized rings S[s i 1]S[s_i^{-1}], ff or gg is invertible.

  • Let SS be an RR-algebra and fSf \in S an element. Assume that any SS-algebra TT in which ff is zero is trivial (fulfills 1=0T1 = 0 \in T). Then ff is invertible in SS.

  • Let SS be an RR-algebra and f[𝔸 1,𝔸 1](S)=S[T]f \in [\mathbb{A}^1,\mathbb{A}^1](S) = S[T] be an element. Then there exists a partition 1= is iS1 = \sum_i s_i \in S such that in the localized rings S[s i 1]S[s_i^{-1}], ff is a polynomial with coefficients in S[s i 1]S[s_i^{-1}].

For the first statement, simply choose s 1fs_1 \coloneqq f, s 2gs_2 \coloneqq g.

For the second statement, consider the SS-algebra TS/(f)T \coloneqq S/(f).

The third statement is immediate, localization is not even necessary.

Remark

Since the big Zariski topos is cocomplete (being a Grothendieck topos), one can also get rid of the external disjunction and refer to the object 𝔸 1[X]\mathbb{A}^1[X] of internal polynomials: The canonical ring homomorphism 𝔸 1[X][𝔸 1,𝔸 1]\mathbb{A}^1[X] \to [\mathbb{A}^1,\mathbb{A}^1] (given by evaluation) is an isomorphism.

See also at synthetic differential geometry applied to algebraic geometry.

Examples

Projective space

The diagonal action of the multiplicative group on the product 𝔸 n:= i=1n𝔸 1\mathbb{A}^n := \prod_{i = 1 \cdots n} \mathbb{A}^1 for nn \in \mathbb{N}

𝔸 n×𝔾 m𝔸 n \mathbb{A}^n \times \mathbb{G}_m \to \mathbb{A}^n

is dually the morphism

k[t,t 1,,t n]k[t 1,,t n] k[t, t_1, \cdots, t_n] \leftarrow k[t_1, \cdots, t_n]

given by

t itt i. t_i \mapsto t \cdot t_i \,.

This makes k[t,{t i}]k[t,\{t_i\}] the free graded algebra over kk on nn generators t it_i in degree 1. This is \mathbb{N} \subset \mathbb{Z}-graded. What is genuinely \mathbb{Z}-graded is

𝒪(𝔸 n{0})k[t 1,t 1 1,,t n,t n 1]. \mathcal{O} (\mathbb{A}^n - \{0\}) \simeq k[t_1, t_1^{-1}, \cdots, t_n, t_n^{-1}] \,.

The quotient by the multiplicative group action

𝔸P k n:=(𝔸 n+1{0})/𝔾 m \mathbb{A} P^n_k := (\mathbb{A}^{n+1} - \{0\})/\mathbb{G}_m

is the projective space over kk of dimension nn.

𝔸 1\mathbb{A}^1-homotopy theory

In A^1 homotopy theory one considers the reflective localization

Sh (C) 𝔸 1Sh (C) Sh_\infty(C)_{\mathbb{A}^1} \stackrel{\leftarrow}{\hookrightarrow} Sh_\infty(C)

of the (∞,1)-topos of (∞,1)-sheaves over a site CC such as the Nisnevich site, at the morphisms of the form

p 1:X×𝔸 1X p_1 : X \times \mathbb{A}^1 \to X

that contract away cartesian factors of the affine line.

References

Discussion of étale homotopy type is in

  • Armin Holschbach, Johannes Schmidt, Jakob Stix, Étale contractible varieties in positive characteristic (arXiv:1310.2784)

Last revised on February 13, 2025 at 18:12:55. See the history of this page for a list of all contributions to it.